Sunday, May 8, 2011

CONGRESS AND PARKINSON'S LAW

Parkinson's Law says, "Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion." The work to fill in the time is often referred to as "make work."

Thanks to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, that seems to be what's going on in Washington right now. For months the Obama administration had talked about the U.S. running out of money this spring unless the debt limit was raised above the current legal level of $14.3 trillion. Failure to act in a timely way could mean the U.S. defaulting on its financial obligations, bringing on bankruptcy which in turn would lead to an international financial meltdown. Then it was said the spring deadline could be stretched a bit by various methods of juggling of the books. Then last week the Treasury Department reported a greater than expected increase in revenues, extending the debt ceiling deadline to early August. A timely extension since Congress begins a one-month recess/vacation on August 8.

Here is where Parkinson's Law begins to enter the picture. If the spring debt deadline had held, Congress would now be engaged in a bitter partisan dispute about using the debt ceiling issue as a vehicle for forcing more spending cuts on the administration. Within that context extension of the deadline until August has given the administration and Congress time needed to work out an acceptable agreement on the debt-spending issue. Reports are circulating that Vice President Biden, working with a bipartisan group of House and Senate lawmakers, is cobbling together an agreement that combines raising the debt ceiling with near-term spending cuts and a longer term plan for controlling deficits.

What is important to note is that the Biden group is not dealing with the really contentious issues of reducing the costs of medicare and medicaid, two big drivers of deficit spending. Presumably these would be dealt with in the normal budget process, if there is such a thing anymore. That would put the so-called Ryan budget to end medicare as it has operated for the past 45 years and greatly reducing and restructuring medicaid spending up against the far less drastic budget plan of President Obama. But the reality is that making such big decisions will probably be treated in the normal political way -- put off such contentious decisions until after next year's presidential/congressional elections.

So if Treasury has given more time before a debt crisis appears and the big health care decisions are put off until 2013, what will Congress do between now and August to fill up the time, a la Parkinson's Law? Right now it appears that it will be a period for both Republicans and Democrats to set out some political markers that will please their political bases. The GOP House is already moving fast with its appeal-to-the-base priorities.

After the January 19th House vote to repeal the President's health care reform died in the Democratic Senate, the GOP House last week voted to cut off funding for specific parts of the reform law. Like the January repeal vote, these funding cut off are dead on arrival (DOA) in the Senate. In an appeal to its big business constituency, two bills last week cleared GOP-controlled House committees: one was to delay for 18 months putting provisions of last year's financial reform law into effect to regulate Wall Street manipulation of the securities markets; the second was to weaken the key consumer protection provisions of the legislation. Both are likely to pass the House and be DOA in the Senate. Waiting in the House wings are some anti-abortion proposals favored by the Republicans and their right wing political base.

The House Democrats will make a futile attempt to gain passage of provisions to end some of the tax advantages given to the highly profitable oil industry. There is some support within the GOP to take a look at such tax reforms but the Democratic effort to have these actually passed is likely to fail. A similar effort is likely at some point in the Senate where it will face the 60-vote block to floor consideration; if passed, the cuts would be DOA in the House.

The Senate may use the pre-recess period to begin consideration of an immigration reform plan, a topic being discussed increasingly by Obama. A Senate Democratic effort to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill is likely to run up against the 60-vote obstacle for floor consideration, but the Democrats hope the effort will send a signal to Hispanic voters about who their congressional friends and opponents are. But the GOP may find it necessary to support or appear to support some form of immigration reform legislation to avoid the appearance of simply ignoring Hispanic demands and votes.

So Congress will fill up the expanded time it has before the debt deadline with partisan bills designed to appeal to their respective political bases or, in the case of the Hispanics, would-be recruits to the political base. Some other things such as action on various trade bills may get done but gone are such issues as stimulus spending, job-creation legislation, expiration of extensions of unemployment insurance, etc. The bulk of the time both before and after the August vacation will be filled with DOA political legislative proposals. Parkinson didn't say that the expanded time allowed would be filled with meaningful work, just time filling make-work. In the case of Congress, it will be make-work to serve obvious political agendas.

6 comments:

  1. So once again it is politics as usual, the usual being the focus of concern in more on retaining a position then doing what is best for the country. I'd forgotten about the debt ceiling issue as I haven't seen it on the frontlines of the news lately. It seems to me that the postponement of the issue would be a good opportunity to get a jump on it before it becomes critical. It would also be a good time to focus on the economy and jobs. I predict that it will come down to August and we'll have our backs up against the wall again with Congress about to go on recess.

    Tackling the immigration issue is an important task, too important to be done for the wrong reasons. This country needs immigration reform to resolve all the issues surrounding illegal immigration. I'm sure there will be big battles over the amnesty issue with Democrats pushing for it for political reasons (i.e. votes) and the Republicans against it to please the base (also votes).

    ReplyDelete
  2. "The amount of time in which one has to perform a task is the amount of time it will take to complete said task." Another of Parkinson's rules also seems applicable to our current Congress. It seems they were given extra time to address the issue concerning our debt ceiling and it is being put aside. I find it disconcerting that the more serious issues are being neglected for the typical political pandering. I'm sure that I'm generalizing Congress as a whole but as a body the job should be to focus on jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dpchuck

    For me the longer time period for resolving the debt ceiling problem is a dilemma. On the one hand the added time may help Biden and his bipartisan group come up with a package that is marketable in Congress. If the original spring deadline had held we would now be engaged in the usual ideological shootout which we need a rest from. It is also a way, I think, of clearly separating the issue of the budget from the debt celing problem. On the other hand, as said in the posting, the added time seems to be just giving Congress another opportunity to try to make political points with their bases rather than do serious business.

    On immigration, keep in mind that there are actually two significant issues on the table, at least they were on the table last year. One is the comprehensive reform bill which seeks to get at the amnesty issue for most undocumented workers. The second is the DREAM Act which is a more modest proposal to help the undocumented young people who attend college or join the military to have a path to citizenship. If the immigration issue gets attention, as I suspect it will, the DREAM act has better prospects than the comprehensive bill. DREAM may be a way for both parties to say they have done something to help Hispanics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. SnoopDog

    Unfortunately, your general assessment about Congress is the one that we all share even though there are persons and groups within Congress who would really like to do some serious work. As a left of center person, I chose to think of some of the liberal elements as the serious ones with the right just using the time for playing another round of politics. In any case, the current modus operandi of both sides, generally speaking, is to play "gotcha" politics. The focus is on trying to politically embarrass the opposition rather than getting down to important business such as job creation. Unfortunately, the jobs issue seems to be lost in terms of doing anything legislatively. Jobs is now just another issue for attacking back and forth. The closest we are likely to get to linking jobs and legislation is when the Republicans will again come forward to say that cutting taxes is the best way to create jobs. Ho hum.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sounds more like Parkinson's affliction diagnosed as an inability to focus on the important task at hand and continue to procastinate. I've watched discussions about the debt ceiling on some of the talking heads shows and it sounds like we're no further along in any resolution than we were when this was supposed to be resolved in April. I imagine that come August we'll have our backs up against the wall with the integrity and economy of the US at risk. At some point entitlements will have to be addressed. There are too many baby boomers coming up for retirement to risk social security and medicare. Meaningful work will have to be done at some point but I'm afraid nothing meaningful will happen before the election year is over.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Palmer

    I believe the talking heads are correct. Vice President Biden is working with a bipartisan group to come up with some debt ceiling bill that will take into account less spending now and some binding commitment for the future. But as I understand it nothing is being worked out on the big ticket items like health care. Now along comes Boehner and throws his grenade over the fence saying no debt increase unless there are trillions in savings which would require some real work to be done on the big ticket items now rather than in the future. I am far from a Boehner fan, but one does wonder how long Congress and the administration can put off dealing with the big stuff.

    I agree with you tht come August on raising the debt ceiling, we'll have a re-run of the April down-to-the-deadline deal on the 2011 budget.

    ReplyDelete