Sunday, March 27, 2011

RAINING ON THE TEA PARTY PARADE, NEAR AND LONG TERM

The tea party (TP) and its fellow traveling (FT) organizations started as a protest movement and remains a protest movement. Given that their central concerns are spending, deficits, debt, and growth of government, they should have a long life ahead. For the TP/FT, whatever is achieved will never be enough. As I said in a previous post, they purvey a new political puritanism, if you don't agree with us on everything, we will get you at the next election. So this could be a good week for the TP/FT.

One of the umbrella TP organizations, the TP Patriots is organizing a protest in Washington on Thursday to hold the feet to the fire of establishment GOP lawmakers, and Speaker Boehner in particular. Their message: House Republicans must insist on a $61 billion cut in federal spending for the current fiscal year which ends on September 30. This is hardly a new demand but it comes just as the current short-term spending resolution is set to expire on April 8. The $61 billion figure was set weeks ago, but, unable to get that and in order to keep the government running, House Republicans have had to settle for a series of short-term funding resolutions. Now the TP/FT is saying, "if you can't get the $61 billion cut, shut down the government."

That too would hardly seem new but there seems to be a feeling among both GOP House leaders and Democratic leaders in the Senate that getting another short-term spending resolution, say for another 3-4 weeks,won't happen. Reportedly, the Democratic Senators are willing to go $20 billion in cuts which in any final agreement would probably reach $30+ billion. To those of us who have watched this mess for months, it's time for Congress to do something that will close out the budget battles for fiscal 2011, if for no other reason than to clear the field for resuming combat over fiscal 2012. The first skirmishes should come soon as the GOP presents its alternative to Obama's 2012 budget plan. With the seeming ability of Congress to exploit every legislative rule in the books, it is not clear why it's not possible to do something to get us beyond April 8. Congress should feel particularly pressed to end the budget war now, since, just back from a one week recess, it has to prepare for another two week recess for Easter.

And this is where the Thursday TP/FT protest gathering in Washington is aimed. They are adamant about the $61 billion. Here is where Boehner is caught between the proverbial rock and the hard place. If he opens himself up to a lower compromise number, he may lose a good share of the 87 new House members, many who ran openly as TP candidates with others being hardline conservatives equally adamant on spending, deficit issues. The April 8 resolution passed the House with substantial Democratic backing, a clear embarrassment to Boehner who has been red faced on several earlier occasions when TP/FT lawmakers deserted him.

We left of center people always hold out the hope that the TP will overplay its extremist hand and backfire in favor of the Democrats. In the short term, we can hope for a downpour on Thursday. I'll close out this posting with two long-term downside trends for the TP/FT.

First is a study based on census data showing an increasing number of African-Americans are moving out of northern urban areas and heading for cities and communities, large and small, in the south the original population heartland of African-Americans a century ago. The TP/FT is alive and well throughout the nation, but the south with its concentrations of TP/FT, plus evangelicals/fundamentalists is seen as its heartland. Demographics don't change quickly but for those far right enthusiasts thinking ahead, a new wave of African-American residents is not exactly what the male, white dominated movement wants to see. Further, apparently the African -Americans moving south are choosing places with small black population, presumably diluting white control.

Of no less concern must be the Census report that Hispanics are the fastest growing ethnic group in the nation. The TP movement, along with its fellow travelers, share that anti-immigration, nativist feeling that the desired white, protestant culture is threatened to be swallowed up by the brown, Catholic Hispanics who live among us. The new group now represents 16.3 percent of the population, up hugely from the 12.5 percent in 2000. Further, as the fastest growing ethnic group, Hispanics will see the obvious political advantages accruing to them.

I won't be around as these long-term demographic trends and policies play out, but in the near term, I am hoping for heavy rain in Washington on Thursday.

10 comments:

  1. It is getting a little ridiculous that we don't have a budget for 2011 and we're almost done with the second quarter of the fiscal year. I am starting to think we need to have Congress get things done or no recess. I am not a big fan of the TP and don't like the idea of them holding the government hostage for a shutdown if their "demands" aren't met.

    ReplyDelete
  2. p.s. maybe if we perform a rain dance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The whole budget fight seems a little silly in the first place. Nothing but a lot of game playing and posturing for political effect. I think a lot of people know that no true deficit reduction is going to occurr without addresing the entitlement programs. The nitpicking over the amounts now is not helping the the big problems facing teh country which are unemployment and the huge deficit. But maybe things will be better off if the government is shut down.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Carole

    I like the idea--no budget, no recess. It's a parent-child model of changing behavior and thus might be the best way to get Congress to get its work done before taking a rest.

    The one satisfaction I get from the TP is that it is part of a food fight within the Republican party. The next step will be to add the social agenda to the fiscal one. The TP social agenda is broadly more acceptable across the Republican party but not sure the public wants to get diverted to issues such as abortion, religious values, etc. before the big fiscal/economy problems are solved.

    Maybe that's what we should be doing, organizing a national rain dance for Thursday.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jeffrey

    The sad part is that fighting over the budget is an important part of making public policy, perhaps the most important part. But the way it has been handled gives it a "silly" character indeed. Given the $1+ trillion share of overall spending being discussed, doubt there are many who believe that between $20 and $60 billion can't be found somewhere and agreed upon. But as the posting says, the TP right now is taking an all or nothing stand.

    As you suggest, it's the congressional/political way and am not sure how we get to a serious long-term discussion about taxing and spending if we can't even deal with the current fiscal year.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maybe the 2011 budget will be decided before they start working on the 2012 budget. It is hard to understand why there is so much trouble coming to a consensus on a budget, but then it is usually politics and not the substance of the issue at hand that is at the heart of the matter. I can support the Tea Party on its desire to reduce spending and get the huge deficit down, but I draw the line on the social agenda. I'm not a big fan of anybody imposing their social agenda upon society as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  7. dpchuck

    You put your finger on the right word, "consensus". Another word that might work also is "compromise". But whether "consensus" or "compromise", the heart of the problem is that Speaker Boehner can't corral the tea party types to support either term. For the TP it's all or nothing and the all is a $61 billion cut in the remainder of fiscal 2011. A compromise $30 to $40 billion is not acceptable to the TP. This all goes back to previous postings about whether the establishment GOP will co-opt the TP or the reverse.

    As to the social agenda, it has been around a long time on the right; it's now a question of whether those supporting the various items on that agenda can attach themselves to the TP and let it be the voice of social change. Believe there are many within the TP who are skeptical of making a social agenda a part of their agenda and thus risk diluting their focus on spending, deficits, debt, and the growth of government, as well as fearing a backlash from those who support the TP on fiscal issues but don't want to get involved with social issues.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We need reform that protects against a tidal wave of debt that is going to come if things continue as they are currently going. The issue is clear that the biggest issues driving our debt is all the entitlement programs: medicare, social security, and medicaid/health care. The programs have to be reformed now. If we continue to wait the problem gets worse and in the future the money won't be there and everybody gets hurt. The debt needs to be a top priority to Congress, not just the house but the senate.

    I heard the Schumer phone call and his talking about how Boehner is being pulled too far to the right by the tea party so the democrats won't negotiate. Schumer was saying he wants the government to shut down.

    ReplyDelete
  9. boomer

    Believe there is "general" agreement about the need to overhaul the entitlement programs, but things will become politically nasty when it comes to the specifics. Also, any big push to deal with the spending issues associated with the entitlement problems must also include a look at the tax code to examine the possibilities for increasing revenues. There are a number of places in the tax code where both personal and business deductions should be re-examined.

    Schumer tends to stretch any argument to its elastic limits, but I agree with the basic point that the tea party has made it difficult for Boehner to talk compromise. If Boehner had some wiggle room, I suspect that the final compromise would come closer to the TP/GOP number than to the Democratic offering.

    ReplyDelete
  10. boomer

    P.S. and beside the dollar amount of cuts there are also the policy issues pressed by the TP and spending hawks, issues such as defunding health care reform, cutting off funds to Planned Parenthood, and curbing the EPA on various regulatory issues. It is difficult to imagine the Democratic Senate being willing to okay such policy changes.

    ReplyDelete