In the period from the l950s into the 70s, the phrase "revolution of rising expectations" (RRE) was popularized to explain the outlook of people in colonial and post-colonial countries as the people looked to a brighter future. RRE was also applied more generally to underdeveloped nations of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. While part of RRE was attributed to expectations for a better future after shedding the colonial rulers, those expectations were also significantly fueled by a growing awareness of what was looked at as "the good life" in the developed world -- a world of cars, good housing, educational opportunities, abundant food, and proper health care. The problem was that the reality in the underdeveloped world did not rise to the expectations, thus fostering political unrest and rebellion. RRE may help explain an episode of unrest in this country, current unrest in the Arab world, and the possibility of future unrest in China.
In a sense the U.S. had its own RRE and rebellious fallout in the l960s with the urban riots of African-Americans in northern cities. The civil rights movement in the l950s and early 60s led to national legislation that banned various forms of legal and social discrimination in the south. However, the new legal and political empowerment of African-Americans in the south did nothing for their counterparts in the north where many forms of economic and social discrimination existed. These involved the day-to-day world of lack of employment opportunities, poor housing, and other forms of racially based deprivation. A "we're not going to take any more" outlook led to violent riots, triggered by events such as a court verdict, in northern cities beginning in l964, reaching their zenith with the assassination of Martin Luther King in the spring of l968.
RRE may have some value in understanding what is currently going on in the Arab world. Within the context of post-colonialism it would seem that ending exploitive and repressive colonial rule would create expectations of better things to come both politically and economically. But what resulted in many of the Arab countries was decades of autocratic rule which banned or limited political dissent and which separated the population into a small population of politically well connected "haves" and a large mass of "have nots". What evolved was the politically oppressed and economic "have nots" merging into movements to overthrow the autocrats as has occurred in Tunisia and Egypt but has yet to be fully played out in countries like Yemen, Bahrain, Syria, and perhaps Jordan.
Now to China which has come a long way since the very oppressive years of Mao Tse- tung. There has been a remarkable opening up of the Chinese economy to foreign investment and a market economy, although still controlled by the ruling communist regime. The opening up of the economy has not been matched by a loosening of political control which seeks to shut off any dissent whether in the form of street demonstrations or the linking of dissenters through the internet or social networks such as Facebook.
The big concern among Chinese leaders these days is that the opening up of the economy which has led to the economic improvement for tens of millions can also lead to frustration and dissent if the economy falls on hard times. Right now the Chinese economy is in the stage of continual robust growth with the benefits spilling over to the workers and motivating the rural poor to migrate to the cities in search of jobs and a better life. But some trouble signs are appearing. A nagging problem of the robust growth is the accompanying need to slow overheating and prevent hyperinflation. The government has taken steps to slow inflation through such things as higher interest rates and requiring banks to hold more cash reserves to slow lending.
The fear, however, is that further inflation will push prices up to the point where the higher prices eat into the welfare of the workers. Further, the higher prices will extend to China's export market, the engine of its growth, to the point of cuttings its sales abroad which in turn will lead to worker layoffs and have a chilling effect on the millions of rural poor hoping to improve their lives by becoming urban workers.
For the near-term future, China does not appear to be threatened by RRE-based rebellion but the Chinese government is hypersensitive to any real or perceived future dissent. So any political ripple effects flowing from economic difficulties, real or perceived, are likely to be met with very harsh repression. The Tunisian and Egyptian models are clearly not the wave of the future in China.
All the RRE in the middle east seems to be occurring at the same time and in courntries where the rulers have been in place a long time. It is like a domino effect over there starting with one country and then spreading to another. I wonder if this country will see anohter RRE in the future in the hispanic community. It is hard to imagine a RRE in China as it seems the leaders there have such a strong control over everything.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. I have never heard the term before and looked up some information on it. I found information on it as being a social development theory. If we go back through history there are probably lots of incidences of RRE that we could now recognize such as the French Revolution. When huge societies are repressed by an autocratic regime it must be hard to see the oppulence in western countries and compare it to your own circumstances. It is even evident within their own countries where the aristocracy is extremely wealthy like Mubarek while the general populace lives in poverty.
ReplyDeleteJeffrey
ReplyDeleteRRE does seem to have some explanatory value for what's going on in the Arab world but we have to be aware of the country-by-country differences behind the uprisings. An interesting thought about a possible Hispanic RRE in the future. Perhaps with the growing political power of the Hispanics they will have their grievances addressed without civil unrest.
It does seem unlikely that uprisings and rebellion are in China's future, at least the forseeable future. But as long as the political leadership fears such, it will squash dissent wherever it is detected.
dpchuck
ReplyDeleteOnce RRE came forth as an explanation for dissent and rebellion, it quickly became a template for looking back over history to explain such things as the French Revolution. In the contemporary world we have to be careful about how we think of RRE as a generalized explanation of what's going on and and how new regimes and respond to it in policy terms. As I noted in my comment to Jeffrey above, there are important country-by-country differences in the underlying dynamics behind the dissent/revolution. In Tunisia it seemed to be a rural-based dissent that was brought to the cities where the regime had suppressed important groups such as urban labor organizations. In Egypt it was an urban based uprising in which pro-democracy and economic have-nots merged. In Libya there is a major element of tribal rivalry underlying the civil war there. In Bahrain the dissent is signficantly driven by Shia-Sunni differences underlying economic grievances. These differences mean nuanced differences in responding to dissent and not a one-solution-fits-all approach.
I agree about China and it is the fear of uprising that is more important than the reality.
Interestingly, the post-colonial strongmen ruling so many African and Arab countries learned well from their European predecessors. So many have lasted a long, long time. I’m trying to understand what was the brew of circumstances in Tunisia, Egypt and the rest that led to the uprisings we see now. What’s different from 20 or 10 or 5 years ago that triggered this RRE, if that’s really what it is? Perhaps it’s not so much a rise of expectation but an enabling tool that allowed the unrest to organize itself organically and give the expectations somewhere to go. That tool would be the internet and social networking technology that linked protestors despite efforts of ruling regimes to suppress it. The rest of the world could instantly see photos and video shot not by journalists but the people on the street using their cell phones. Nowadays we fight our enemies with unmanned drones operated by soldier-technicians thousands of miles away sitting in front of computer screens and using an instrument not unlike a videogame controller. Maybe the technology will evolve us to the point where we fight whole wars virtually and determine winners and losers without the loss of a drop of actual human blood.
ReplyDeleteSidney
ReplyDeleteI believe RRE has some general explanatory value for describing the development of an underlying critical mass that will set off an an uprising or rebellion (successful or unsuccessful) but the mix that makes up the mass will vary from country to country. The Tunisian revolution was set off with the self-immolation of a young man who couldn't find work and whose fruit cart was seized by the police. That brought together groups such as a strong but suppressed labor movement that had held anti-regime grievances for years. The coalesence of such groups provided the critical mass that elevated events from protest to revolution, greatly aided by the internet and social networks. That's how it seems to me. The self-immolation was the triggering event for Tunisia and the Tunisian revolution itself was the triggering event for Egypt. Like Tunisia, there were pro-democracy and economic have-not groups that had held grievances against the government for years. Their going to the streets and Tahrir square spread to other demographic groups through the internet and social networking technology. That dynamic, along with the army's eventual siding with the demonstrators was the downfall of Mubarak. What may be different from 10 or 20 years ago is what you suggest--technology and the ability to recruit other dissidents to the cause and then to display to the world what was happening through the same technology.
Interesting that you should mention drones at a time when we are starting to use them in Libya. While the use of such does remove humans from harm's way, there is something scarey about your image of the technician thousands of miles away pulling the trigger like in a video game. That reminded me of World War II movies in which bomber pilots never really knew how many people they were killing and thus were psychologically protected from the experience of pulling a trigger and personally watching a person die. We may never get to the end point you suggest. The Mayan calendar says the earth is doomed in December 2012.
1. cash
ReplyDelete2. cash
3. cash......
when cash flows: all happy...
as long as cash flow...
CCP: chinese chicken party will in power....
once cash ends: all bets are off.
1911/ 1949: from baby-emperor to red emperor....
Charles Darwin
ReplyDeleteToo long to be haiku and too choppy to be iambic pantameter; enjoyed both the creativity and the rhythm.
In U.S. the ending is:
"once cash ends: we'll have a tea party.
1945/2011: from the mountain top to the rabbit hole."