Tuesday, January 18, 2011

U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS: THE ENDLESS ROLLERCOASTER RIDE

This may not be accurate but to the casual observer it seems that everytime a high U.S. official visits China or vice versa, the lead into the story deals with the visit being an opportunity to repair U.S.-Chinese relations-- political, military, and/or economic. So it is with the current visit to Washington of Chinese President Hu Jintao. I don't know whether it's because the Chinese are easily offended or that they think they still need to muscle their way into the role of a world power, a world in which its chief competitor is the United States. If the first, then maybe there isn't too much we can do about it; if the second, "enough already", you've arrived. Then, of course, U.S. leaders tend to get preachy from time to time such as Secretary of State Clinton's taking the pulpit recently in Qatar admonishing a group of Arab leaders about their need to reform politically and economically, or else. Such preaching can be offensive and over time we certainly have done some preaching to China.

And the Chinese seem to cherry pick when it wants the U.S. to involve itself in China's issues with other nations. For example, China would like U.S. involvement in settling China's long standing border dispute with India. But takes a "butt out" attitude about China's disputes with Japan and a number of Southeast Asia countries over control of various islands in the China Sea. Having said all that, I'll now get to the business of what this posting is about, which is to use the Hu visit to update two earlier postings -- "What a Difference Having Money Makes" and "China Reinvents the Co-Prosperity Sphere."

Since those postings, there have been significant developments. The starting point of the first piece was that the U.S. is upon hard economic and financial times while China continues to build up its huge reserve of foreign currencies, now about $2.5 trillion, plus gold. The key point was that President Obama's November trip, while focused on building closer ties with India, was also a sales job. That is, making deals that would increase our exports and thus create needed jobs in this country. While Obama was doing a kind of "on the cheap" tour, Hu was using some of the Chinese cash to buy European products (and thus help Europe's job creation) and embedding China into Europe's financial problem by committing or semi-committing his country to helping Europe with its fiscal crisis and thus taking pressure off of the Euro. That effort goes on.

Just last week the Chinese Vice Premier was in Europe making more trade deals and assuring European leaders that China would be buying more debt of the countries in trouble, particularly Portugal and possibly Spain if the need arises. It had already purchased some Greek bonds. It should also be noted that Japan has told European leaders that it also would buy some of the debt to ease pressure on the Euro. These commitments, of course, are not just some form of international altruism or trying to make political points. Both countries have an economic stake in preventing any further decline in the value of the Euro. A decline makes Chinese and Japanese exports to Europe more costly and thus reduces the flow of trade. Now to Chinese expansion of its neo- Co-Prosperity Sphere.

As noted in the earlier posting, the Chinese seem to be succeeding where the Japanese utterly failed during World War II. As stated, Japan sought to create an East Asian economic empire through invasion and conquest, followed by economically raping the conquered countries to guarantee the economic security of the homeland. That ended with Japan's defeat in l945. What seems to have emerged today is a strategy by China to create a co-prosperity zone through investments and trade. And as noted previously, China has made important inroads into the economies of Southeast Asia. Less noticed has been its economic and financial invasion in Central Asia, an area once part of the Soviet Union before its collapse in 1991.

The region now has five independent countries -- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. According to reports, China has been quietly inserting huge sums of money there to develop, for example, oil and gas infrastructure that will help assure its energy needs in the future. Also, according to these reports, trade in general has grown greatly between China and these countries after a vacuum was created with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The United States is not a disinterested party in what happens in Central Asia. In addition to our general concern about any kind of Chinese expansion, it's a region involved in supply routes for our war in Afghanistan with a major U.S. air base in Kyrgyzstan. According to an item from WikiLeaks, China offered that country $3 billion to shut down the base. Russia has also sought to have the base closed down. Kyrgyzstan did threaten to close the base, but chose instead to settle for a higher rent which rose from $17 to $60 million a year. Neither country wants a U.S. military presence in a region that has always been in the sphere of influence or under complete control of China or Russia. In addition to efforts to economically integrate Central Asia into its Co-Prosperity Sphere, China also sees more integration of the region helping with its sometimes very serious problem of conflict between the Chinese and Muslim residents in parts of the region.

In sum, Hu's visit to Washington comes at a time when China is on the move with the U.S. government itself unable to counter proportionally with direct economic and investment tools, relying on our business community, our military presence in the region, and our efforts to build better political and trade relations there. So the state visit is a very important part of our seeking smoother if not a hugging relationship with China, but don't be surprised if something else comes along to chill the relationship still another time.

6 comments:

  1. According to Wikipedia "A superpower is a state with a dominant position in the international system which has the ability to influence events and its own interests and project power on a worldwide scale to protect those interests." I think China definitely falls
    within that definition given their economics reach throughout the world. I don't expect much of anything to come out of the visit with respect to the markets, especially strengthening of the Yuan. With respect to
    other issues like North Korea and Iran, I don't expect there will be any big news there either. Both countries agree that Iran must uphold
    its international obligations and the UN sanctions must continue to be enforced. I think the warm fuzzies will come more from letting the two giant pandas stay at the National Zoo for five more years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. dp

    By Wikipedia's definition and the common perception, China has indeed arrived. Guess they can't help having some sensitity about their position in the world after centuries of the west and Japan controlling their major trading cities and even running their customs service for many years, as well as exploiting the Chinese through the opium trade. And, of course, during WWII, the U.S. clearly chose to side with the nationalists rather than the communists. So suspicion and distrust is part of their history.

    You're right. The Chinese have made it clear that they will revalue the Yuan at their own pace, a slow one. And since self-interest is the standard of every nation, that policy serves their self-interest, if not ours.

    As to North Korea, the Chinese are somewhat between the rock and the hard place since the last thing they want is for the northern regime to be replaced by a democratic one right on their border. And the tougher things get in North Korea, the more refugees flow across the border into China. So they walk softly. As to Iran, the most interesting thing is that they finally did join in on the latest round of sanctions and about a week ago when Iran had reps from various countries visit their nuclear facilities, China, along with Russia, U.S. and western Europe declined to include a representative to be show cased by Iran.

    Add to the pandas, the fact that the Chinese invested $3.5 million for a Chinese arts theater in Branson, Missouri. Although this wasn't part of the $45 billion plus pandas package, the Chinese have a gift for going where the American heart is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm curious: What relationship does China have with Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cosmo

    For Iran and Iraq, China is driven by the same fundamental goal--secure its energy sources. China has money invested in oil field development in both countries. Interestingly, during the Saddam years, China was also an arms supplier to both and when Iran and Iraq went to war under Saddam, China sold arms to both sides--an equal opportunity arms dealer.

    Despite the fact that China has supported U.N. economic sanctions on Iran because of the nuclear issue, it usually has to be dragged kicking and screaming to a "yes" vote and, along with Russia, has forced the U.S. to soften its sanctions demands in order to get that "yes" vote. As I said in replying to dpchuck above, China declined to send a representative to be part of an international group invited to inspect Iran's nuclear facilities a week or so ago. The group that went primarily included reps from the Arab League countries. In sum, one would have to say that China, despite voting for U.N. sanctions against Iran has kept good relations with both countries, even with U.S. occupation of Iraq.

    As to Afghanistan, there has been a lot of back and forth visiting between Chinese and Afghan officials and I believe China has committed or pledged redevelopment resources to Afghanistan.
    Although they barely share a border, China has gone some distance to have good relations with neighboring Muslim countries. Also think the generally warm relations with the Karzai government may flow from the close ties the Afghan Taliban have with Pakistan. And because of the continuing tense relations with India over border disputes and the hostile relations between India and Pakistan, it's kind of like "an enemy of my enemy is my friend". So China keeps very good relations with Pakistan and Afghanistan may get some collateral benefits from that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I guess China has a big interrest in middle Asia the middle east if they are trying to shore up their oil and gas infrastructure. I guess as with any country China is "friends" with whatever countery serves their economic and other interests It had not struck me that they were really interested in sanctioning Iran. I read some conclusions on the visit which sound nice if the "we should treat each other with respect" comes through. That quote is a good one. It always reminds me of David Carradine - "the enemy of my enemy is my friend grasshopper".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jeff

    If China could have gotten away with no new sanctions on Iran, the Chinese would have been quite happy. Like you say, they are opposed to sanctions. But going along with sanctions, even if softened, indicates that China understands she is now a world power and can't just ignore the role with some form of cooperation, as needed.

    With India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, having a 63-year history of hostility, any country seeking to adjust its relations with one or the other has to do a balancing act. We certainly do. If they ever replace the late Richard Holbroke as our special representative to deal with the Afghanistan/Pakistan issue, they should add India to the territory. We have to deal with all at once.

    ReplyDelete